Posted 3 months ago
save money, don't drink. find a human person to do non-alcohol stuff with
Anonymous asked

I would like some alcohol but not a lot. Maybe just a drink or two. I’ll make sure to have a DD with me though :)

Posted 3 months ago

commandersheena:

In one of my film classes last semester we had to tell a story in 3 pictures for a mini assignment so my friend and I did this

Posted 3 months ago
"Sexy had died. You have to bring it back."
inviciousx asked

ptrcpldi:

me?

you got the wrong person, my friend.

Posted 3 months ago

spacebetweentwonumbers replied to your post: spacebetweentwonumbers replied to your post: I…
I wish that skate place was open still. We could go and do that, or midnight laser bowling or whatever. Or we could dress up and reenact famous paintings/photos. Or do a big scavenger hunt with clues relating to things about you.

Haha these are awesome!! I’d want to do all of them :D I’very forgotten how creative you are. Dude I’m missing out on amazingness!

Posted 3 months ago

spacebetweentwonumbers replied to your post: I have no plans for my 21st on Saturday. Any…
we could drive some place and get sparklers and play with fireworks and watch the sunrise while playing sappy music from a stereo?

I LIKE IT! ANOTHER!

Posted 3 months ago

I have no plans for my 21st on Saturday.
Any ideas?

Posted 3 months ago

homohustle:

jotarokujo:

what if the new animal species we discover each year are actually being dropped off by aliens? like they have an over abundance of yeti crabs or something and so they brought some to earth because they knew we’d get a kick out of this

image

This is the cutest conspiracy theory I’ve ever heard

Posted 3 months ago

bookworm5-:

shota-purinsu:

zorobro:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “doulos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (doulos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13

THIS IS WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY TEACHES ABOUT SAME SEX COUPLES.

In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.

j

(Source: idiotsonfb)

Posted 3 months ago

Angelina Jolie worked very closely with the costume and make-up designers to develop Maleficent’s menacing look. Disney executives objected, hoping to take advantage of Jolie’s beauty in marketing the film, but the actress insisted that the character maintain the scarier look of the animated incarnation.

(Source: anotherouatwriter)

Posted 3 months ago
Posted 3 months ago

beyoncebeytwice:

when attractive people compliment me on things i get suspicious because remember when regina george complimented that one girl on her skirt

Posted 3 months ago

nerdette-with-the-top-hat:

lumos5001:

POTTERHEADS WE HAVE A RELEASE DATE!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!! WE HAVE A RELEASE DATE!!! [x]

Posted 3 months ago
Posted 3 months ago

I was at my internship for 12 hours today.
I’m completely and utterly exhausted.

Posted 3 months ago
dederants:

afrig:

toweringstark:

justamus:

cute-overload:

My Uncle forgot to roll up the window to his truck, and we found this little guy inside.

He hates you.
He hates everything.
But especially you.

that owl is almost entirely head. Head and hatred.

IT’S SO CUTE

HEAD AND HATRED

dederants:

afrig:

toweringstark:

justamus:

cute-overload:

My Uncle forgot to roll up the window to his truck, and we found this little guy inside.

He hates you.

He hates everything.

But especially you.

that owl is almost entirely head. Head and hatred.

IT’S SO CUTE

HEAD AND HATRED